1) Obama has an element of class that Bush has never had. This is not a reflection on his (or Bush's) character, per se, but it does matter. People will approach him differently, and this will make an immense difference in how he handles foreign policy AND how foreign government officials see him. Living over seas the last few years has made me more sensitive to this aspect of the Presidency. Though I don't think the president should bend over backwards for every whim of world leader opinion, approaching their opinions at least with a measure of respect for their objectives and goals is something Bush hasn't done well. I also believe that Obama won't make sweeping changes to foreign policy goals and objectives anyway. Tactical differences maybe, but the same ultimate goals. (which is, obviously, destroying Iran...
2) Having a half-African American in the White house will have a positive effect on race relations. While race relations in the US are not at the low point of the 50's, 60's and 70's, this barrier has not been fully overcome. Having an African American man in the position will do two things, I believe. a) continue to 'normalize' perceptions of non-whites for whites who still have racial bias b) give a new perception to African American men and boys as to what is possible and what they are capable of. Personal perception is such a strong determinant and so often our self-perception is determined by what people around us - who are like us - have become or say they are able to become.
3) Obama brings to the Presidency an awareness of the poor that is rare for people in power. To be honest, some of his economic policies worry me. Some of his statements about "spreading the wealth" don't make me excited. However, he still needs to be reelected. So do the people who will vote (or not vote) for any legislation he puts forth. So what good is this? He will be a force pulling the opposite way of those who do not have any concern for the poor. If his policies are too radical, they will be pulled to the right - which is how the government is set up. And if the policies and legislation are too far right, I believe he will be a good check on that, as well.
As I said, I do have concerns about Obama's economic policy, and he is relatively untested, as the republican pundits like to point out. But to say that our country will be ruined by his being elected is alarmist and fails to recognize a) the separation of powers in the US constitution and b) the actual responsibilities of the President.
I'm done.
Oh, and according to the cnn projections, I almost nailed (see end of post) the electoral college vote numbers (only virginia was wrong) and I nailed McCain's percentage of popular vote: 46%.
4 comments:
Interesting... all three of your ideas were nascent in my thoughts today as we watched Obama's acceptance speech in class on the SMART Board. I was thinking: 1) this is a man that people all over the world will be drawn to; 2) this is a man who will repair broken relationships domestically and internationally; 3) this is a man of the people. Maybe he's just got a good speech writer... or maybe that's really who he is.
Obama's speech reminded me of a line from Kevin Costner's The Postman: "You give out hope like it was candy in your pocket." Our world needs that these days...
So thanks, Josh, for giving some flesh to my fleeting thoughts.
Your analysis is intriguing. My thoughts regarding this matter are varied at best.
I voted for Obama on the principle that he ran a more efficient campaign and I believe that how a candidate runs his campaign is how he will run a country. I also believe that Obama surrounded himself with intelligent people as opposed to the McCain campaign which shows a level of judgment that is needed in a presidency.
I will refrain from making predictions or judgments until I see what approaches are taken regarding legislative agendas and presidential influence after inauguration.
Good post.
Interesting assessment. I agree, that his statement of spreading the wealth, was a poor choice of words - politically speaking. However, his idea behind the statement is much deserved in one of the world's wealthiest nations. Class warfare needs to be address. I think it's pretty clear that minimal to zero regulation produce poor results.
Regardless if a person voted for him or against him, everyone needs to wipe the slate clean and judge him on his actions. He could make problems worse or he could heal many wounds that the USA currently has. Only time will tell.
http://change.gov/page/s/application
Do it...I triple-dog-dare you...
Post a Comment